William Bigode will be defendant in a lawsuit involving Gustavo Scarpa

With the request accepted by the defense of Gustavo Scarpa, William Bigode, his company and its partners remained defendants in the process involving a millionaire coup suffered by the former Palmeiras

This last Thursday, the 29th, was published by the judge Daniel Fadel de Castroof the 10th Civil Court of the Court of Justice of São Paulo, the request of the defense of Gustavo Scarpa it was accepted. Therefore, the company William Mustachein addition to himself, his wife and the partners involved in the business remained defendants in the lawsuit promoted by the midfielder, who is trying to recover more than R$ 6 million.

The contribution that Scarpa seeks to recover was made in the company xlandby indication of the attacker and former teammate of palm trees William Mustache. This Friday, the 30th, the defendant’s lawyer filed an appeal to try to get around this situation, claiming that the player from Athletico-PR was also deceived by the company mentioned above.

William has a company called WLJC Consulting and Business Managementtogether with Loisy It is Camila, its partners. Therefore, the inclusion of the business in the process means that the trio is included among those responsible for bearing the amount that Gustavo Scarpa lost after investing in Xland.

“As the elements contained in the case file indicate, through its partners, the defendant company (WLJC) acted as an interlocutor between the plaintiff (Scarpa) and the other service providers, remaining uncontroversial that it was responsible for attracting customers for the defendant Xland and with this it maintains or maintained a true commercial partnership”, is part of the document.

Scarpa in action at Nottingham Forest, England (Credit: Getty Images)

As a justification, the judge added: “I emphasize that there are extensive exchanges of messages via the WhatsApp application between the plaintiff and partner Camila, as well as between the plaintiff and partner Willian, not even contested by the defendants clearly intermediating the investment negotiations, with the sending of the contract, guidance on the amounts for investment and even indicating the account for deposits, showing funding”he stated.


Source: sportbuzz

Related articles

Comments

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share article

Latest articles

Newsletter

Subscribe to stay updated.