The match between Palmeiras x Flamengo was held last Saturday, the 8th, but is still being discussed by the CBF; see what seneme said
the game between palm trees x Flamengo still under discussion at CBF. Through the arbitration commission, headed by Wilson Senemethe Brazilian Football Confederation brought explanations in relation to the controversial penalty Richard Rios in Everton Ribeiro. The bid was pointed out as a potential penalty by the Carioca leaders and gained explanations that were being debated behind the scenes of national football.
Through the CBF program, “Papo de Arbitragem”, Wilson Seneme brought the audios of Ramon Abatti Abel during the match between Palmeiras x Flamengo for the Brasileirão. On the occasion, the referee pointed out that the contact was minimal and that he did not see the existence of an infraction in the bid. According to him, there wasn’t a great force for Everton Ribeiro to fall to the ground and suffer the foul.
Minimum contact and he throws himself. For me, it has no impact on his back. It has contact, but not enough impact to take him down. He holds the stride and throws himself. The impact is minimal“, said the referee during the game between Palmeiras and Flamengo.
Three days after the national classic, Wilson Seneme appeared and explained the controversial arbitration at Allianz Parque. According to him, the bid between Richard Ríos and Everton Ribeiro is extremely difficult and that it was difficult to reach a consensus in the arbitration commission. Even so, the understanding is that there was a potential infraction in the bid.
“Not every shoulder on the back is a fault. But from the moment I put my shoulder behind my back, I have to assess whether the contact is enough to take the player down. For the referees, it wasn’t enough. This is very clear in the narrative of the field referee who saw the move and interpreted it. We are talking about a very fine move. We in the arbitration department are 11 technical instructors and it was absolutely divided. This demonstrates the degree of difficulty. In our general view, the contact, because it was on the back, we see, yes, a potential for an infraction for this play“, he explained.
Source: sportbuzz
I am William Jackson and I have a passion for sports journalism. With over 3 years of experience in the industry, I have worked in a variety of roles to improve the quality and accuracy of sports news coverage. As an author at Athletistic, I specialize in covering football news and providing comprehensive analysis for fans around the world.
