CBF Arbitration Commission agrees with annulled goal in Palmeiras x Vasco

A Arbitration Commission from the CBFa group that evaluates the decisions made by referees in Brazilian football matches, came to the conclusion that the goal Paulinhoof Basqueagainst palm trees, was well cancelled. In order to clarify all doubts, the entity published a video this Tuesday, 29, disclosing the VAR audios.

In the publication, the Commission explained the reasons for the decision to Wilton Pereira Sampaiomatch referee, together with the VAR operator Igor Junio ​​Benevenuto. Among them, the main argument is that there was no start of a new attack by Vasco, that is, the impediment of vegetti was correctly flagged.

Wilson Senemechairman of the Arbitration Commission, was assisted by Pericles Bassolif Giulano Bozzano, two arbitration experts, for their conclusion on the bid. Thus, it was understood that three aspects of the rule support the interpretation that the attack move was not interrupted.

One of the reasons that are plausible for the shot not to have been stopped, according to the refereeing rules, is that the ball removed by Richard Rios remained around the Palmeiras area. In addition, the ball was dominated by a player from Vasco, not from the home team and at the time of the shot, the Colombian midfielder was under pressure from the opponent.

According to the assessment of the CBF Arbitration Commission, the three criteria were completed. Therefore, for Seneme, if the ball was moved further away by Richard Ríos, a new play would be created, as a result. However, the cut stopped in the chest of Paulinho, who was in the middle, and the CBF trio considered that the Colombian was under pressure in the penalty area.