During an anonymous interview HyenasThe still-active Serie A referee, who wanted to denounce some anomalies in the Italian system, also spoke about the episode when VAR overturned a decision made by the match director on the field during the Sassuolo-Lazio match, with Provedel’s first sending off. and then pardoned: “In this sporting season, the most sensational case, in my opinion, is what happened in Sassuolo-Lazio, where there is a situation in which the assistant referee on the field assesses that the goalkeeper has caught the ball with his hands outside the field.” penalty area and therefore in this case the rule is clear: the goalkeeper is sent off, but in this case the VAR refused the assistant. In what sense? The VAR sent images that the Lazio goalkeeper would have in fact caught the ball in his hand on the penalty area line that borders the penalty area. The goalkeeper’s actions were regular. In this case, the sending off was overturned. The images that the VAR sent to the public clearly supported the decision, accepted by VAR. But in fact there are other images where you can clearly see that the ball that was initially touched by the goalkeeper was clearly touched outside the penalty area.. So we need to figure out which frame is the right one. The one that was not sent by VAR, or the one that was sent by VAR on air?
Source: Tutto Mercato Web
I am Ben Stock and I work in Athletistic as an author. My specialty is covering football news and other related topics. I have been writing for this website since the past 2 years, crafting compelling stories with the latest updates in the sports world. My articles have gained widespread appreciation amongst readers due to their accuracy and depth of research.
