“Venice undeservedly lost in Parma, but is still fighting for first place. Johnsen? I’m not tearing my hair out about his transfer; in fact, I’m only discussing the conditions; otherwise, a player who arrived with serious defects and left unfinished was sold for three million. He is a very fast player that Venezia no longer has in the squad, but in terms of his contribution to goals and assists, he did not inspire me: few goals, few assists, in short, Venezia will continue to play without Johnsen. Venice made a deal for three million, the fact that he was not replaced is another matter.
Vanoli? If he had reacted this way, he was clearly only informed at the last minute, and therein lies the mistake: the company may have had needs at some point in its existence, if he had been involved, I am convinced that the reaction would have been very different. . Should I change the module? I think Ellertson is the key: with some conviction he can do a job similar to what Johnsen did, while on the other hand I put Pierini in and it seems to me that from that point of view absolutely nothing has changed.” Thus, from the columns Corriere del Veneto, Michelle Serena.
Source: Tutto Mercato Web
I am Ben Stock and I work in Athletistic as an author. My specialty is covering football news and other related topics. I have been writing for this website since the past 2 years, crafting compelling stories with the latest updates in the sports world. My articles have gained widespread appreciation amongst readers due to their accuracy and depth of research.
