Television presenter and commentator Dmitry Guberniev told that journalists should not be afraid of the head coach’s arrogant behavior »Kuban » Vadim Evseev and recommended taking the blow and responding intelligently.
Earlier, a video appeared where Evseev, at a press conference after the match of the 23rd round of the MELBET First League between Moscow Rodina and Krasnodar Kuban (0:1), refused to give the traditional commentary after -match and in every possible way. interfered with the work of the press secretary of the Moscow team. The event with the participation of the head coach of Kuban lasted less than a minute.
“I want to say to my colleagues who, unlike other football players and coaches, graduated from journalism departments: have the courage to communicate with these people. The behavior is, well, strange. Well, he played football like that too. He also sometimes behaved strangely on the field. Dear colleagues, no need to piss. You need to calm down and smoke calmly and confidently. Imagine that you are Carlson and Vadim Evseev is Uncle Julius.
— What should you do in such situations?
– You have to take the blow and respond intelligently, because it is a common impudence. But when people are faced with a normal reaction and a sense of humor… Maybe you should keep quiet somewhere during a break and let it out. Therefore, I repeat, colleagues need to stop pissing and reread Astrid Lindgren. Carlson’s business is alive and well,” Guberniev told .
In the ranking, Kuban occupies 17th place with 21 points.
Watch live broadcasts of Premier League matches on the and MATCH PREMIER channels, as well as on the matchtv.ru and sportbox.ru sites.
Open a video
Source : MatchTV

I am Ben Stock and I work in Athletistic as an author. My specialty is covering football news and other related topics. I have been writing for this website since the past 2 years, crafting compelling stories with the latest updates in the sports world. My articles have gained widespread appreciation amongst readers due to their accuracy and depth of research.