“The Acerbi-Juan Jesus case? I don’t know what the players and Prosecutor Chine said to each other during interrogations.” This is what the lawyer says Eduardo Chiacchio To Radio Mars: “In sports justice, evidence beyond a reasonable doubt is not needed; a degree of justification slightly above average is sufficient. Unfortunately, this extent was not even touched upon, all the elements that supported Jesus’s accusatory theory were refuted: the video did not show racial slurs, not even the audio recording of the referee with VAR.
The player was believed to have apologized, but there were no witnesses. I was sincerely convinced that some Napoli player was close to Juan Jesus to be able to report the abuse the player received. The Napoli defender could call a player as a witness for questioning, as Santini of Sambenedettese did, who found the support of a teammate. Let’s imagine a hypothesis: Acerbi claims that he did not use racist language, but only insults or threats. Juan, however, says otherwise, so much so that he cites a teammate’s testimony to support his thesis.
Here is the specific case of the Santini case and therefore the disqualification due to testimony. Instead, since that didn’t exist either, there was nothing except video and audio.”
Source: Tutto Mercato Web
I am Ben Stock and I work in Athletistic as an author. My specialty is covering football news and other related topics. I have been writing for this website since the past 2 years, crafting compelling stories with the latest updates in the sports world. My articles have gained widespread appreciation amongst readers due to their accuracy and depth of research.
