Former Lokomotiv president Ilya Gerkus told that Spartak striker Manfred Ugalde “terrorized” the railway defense in the 16th round match of the RPL WORLD.
On Saturday, Spartak defeated Lokomotiv with a score of 5:2 in the home match of the Russian Championship. Ugalde entered the starting lineup and scored a poker.
– Why did Spartak beat Lokomotiv so easily? At least for the first half.
— A quick goal due to a goalkeeper error played some role. Spartak, compared to the match at the Russian Railways Arena, rebuilt its offensive line – Ugalde played as a center forward. And he played simply brilliantly. A few Lokomotiv central defenders played uncertainly and the support zone players played weaker than usual. Ugalde, on the contrary, terrorized the Lokomotiv defense with his shaking. Look at the second goal – he managed to get open, went offside, went offside, got around Montez, took the ball and scored from touch. It’s class.
— For the second time in a row after the international break, Lokomotiv shows unimpressive football compared to what it showed in the other rounds. What is the reason?
– I think the break has nothing to do with it. Breaks have been known for a long time; the training process must of course also be adapted to breaks. I think the problem is that it is more difficult for young players to stay fit all season. You need experience to distribute your forces at a distance and learn not to lose your concentration. This is the main vulnerability of young teams,” Gerkus told .
Watch live broadcasts of MIR RPL matches on the and MATCH PREMIER channels, as well as on the matchtv.ru and sportbox.ru sites.
More sports news in our telegram channel .
Source : MatchTV
I am Ben Stock and I work in Athletistic as an author. My specialty is covering football news and other related topics. I have been writing for this website since the past 2 years, crafting compelling stories with the latest updates in the sports world. My articles have gained widespread appreciation amongst readers due to their accuracy and depth of research.
