Former FIFA referee Sergei Laposhkin on the air, MATCH PREMIER analyzed the controversial episodes of the matches of the 8th round of MIR RPL Krasnodar – Sochi (2: 1), PARI NN – Fakel (3: 1), Orenburg – Khimki (3: 1) and Dynamo – Urals” (2:1).
In the 39th minute of the match in Krasnodar, hosts defender Sergey Borodin crashed into Sochi goalkeeper Denis Adamov, after which the ball flew into the Sochi goal, the goal was disallowed.
– Here the attacker crashes into the goalkeeper, prevents him from playing the ball, picking up this ball, so it is a completely normal violation of the rules. Just a fault without disciplinary sanction. Fault and all. Correctly canceled the goal. The attacker’s shoulder cuts the hands, so the goalkeeper does not recover the ball. It is possible to count, but according to the rules, it is better not to count,” explained Lapochkin.
In the match “BET NN” – “Fakel” guest midfielder Andrey Mendel interrupted Vyacheslav Krotov’s pass, touching the ball with his hand in a prone position. A penalty was awarded, which was converted by Nikolai Kalinsky.
– This is the most difficult moment, it seems to me, of all the controversial moments today, because it is really a support hand, the player simply has nowhere to put it. He rolls across the field, but where will he put her? There is nowhere to go and there are contacts. It seems to me that a penalty should not have been awarded to him, because he put it in support, then a completely random contact.
It is said that when the hand presses, a pass can take place. That’s it, he put it, and then where is he going to put it? Those who will be for the penalty, they will see the movement of the hand towards the ball. Maybe! Some see it too, some don’t. I believe he put it on, then he slides across the field by inertia. It seems to me that it is not punishable, ”says Lapochkin.
In the 8th minute of the match against Orenburg, Khimki’s head coach Spartak Gogniev did not allow the opposing player to put the ball into play quickly.
– Before each season, the judges take theoretical tests in the form of charades, and this question is always present. When the coach interferes with the ball to the opponent, it is a red card. If he had delayed his team, it would have been yellow and the opponent would have been red,” Lapochkin said.
In the same game, at the start of the attack in the 37th minute, the ball and the hand of Orenburg striker Vladimir Sychevy touched, and as a result his team scored against Khimki.
– This is an attack phase. Therefore, in this situation, the player stopped the ball, worked with his hand, then a vertical attack and scored a goal, so the goal was scored absolutely incorrectly. Should have been cancelled. VAR, of course, should come into play here,” Lapochkin said.
In the game “Dynamo” – the player of Muscovites “Ural” Saba Sazonov wrapped the player of his opponent Emerson in the penalty area in the 32nd minute so that the latter could not jump in the direction of the ball.
– He didn’t just hug him, but crossed his arms like a castle, doesn’t look at the ball, he’s not interested in the ball at all and the striker wants to adapt to it. Therefore, it’s a delay, it’s a penalty and a yellow card should be.
I agree that a lot of resonating moments happened during the tour. Why? I don’t know, the guys will find out I guess. At the last moment VAR had to step in,” Lapochkin said on MATCH PREMIER.
Source : MatchTV
My name is Adam Jackson and I am an author. I have been writing about Basketball games for over a decade now and am excited to share my knowledge with you all. Additionally, I am also interested in other sports and enjoy discussing them with others. Contact me if you want to discuss any Basketball-related topics!
