“None of the coaches of the national team, except Bashkirov, had questions about the distribution of salary rates” – head of the RBU coaching council

The head of the Russian Biathlon Union (RBU) coaching council, Vladimir Bragin, told that the national team coaches have no complaints about the distribution of salary rates, so outrage and discontent are now inappropriate.

Earlier, commentator Dmitry Guberniev said that Yemerkhonov, along with Larisa Kuklina and Ilnaz Mukhamedzyanov, were deprived of their salaries in the national team. All three are part of Yuri Kaminsky’s group, which is currently undergoing centralized training in Sochi.

– Firstly, the national team coaches have a working group on WhatsApp, where all the information for the coaches can be found. I won’t say exactly what date, but it was April 20. Rostovtsev sent a letter to the group, which included the distribution of bets for the next season. In the letter, it was written how the tariffs were distributed during the past season and what is the position on the tariff distribution for the next season.

Only 32 bets remain, that is, the main team – 32 people, junior – 16 people, in general – 48 people, 32 bets remain. Last year, the bets were distributed . The juniors had 6 bets. This year, Rostovtsev wrote: “There are 32 bets, I propose to distribute: 6 – for juniors, 8 + 8 – this is the main composition for men and women, according to the criteria of RBU. The first three are from the standings, then the four are those who scored the most points in the main starts of the season in Izhevsk, Chaikovsky and the best junior. That is 3, 4 and 1. Eight for men, eight for women – 16 in total. Then there was a proposal to keep the bets for the Olympic medalists who missed the season – it’s three people. And the remaining six bets will be split between the athletes who entered the main team from 9 to 16 places. Everything was written in the group, and Rostovtsev said: “Anyone who has any suggestions, please let’s go.” There were two offers. The first was written by Bashkirov that Tsvetkov, although he does not meet the criteria in the top eight, but since he is an Olympic medalist, he must be added fourth. I wrote that if the last six fares, which are distributed among the eight, do not go to the main place of work, but to the deputies, then these fares will be given to the juniors who will go to the main. Here are two suggestions for this letter. There were no more questions or suggestions. Everything is there in the group. But they stopped there.

Now some questions have arisen, honestly I don’t understand where. When it is said that a person has found himself without a salary and that he does not work and that a person is 30 years old, it seems to me that, to put it mildly, this is not true. Nobody canceled our contracts with CSKA, nobody canceled the contracts at the place of residence. And now the pension fund has been merged with the social fund. When they say that a person does not work anywhere, but apparently they also did not express a particular desire for the main place of work. But if a person does not go to the main place of work, it means that he apparently works somewhere and receives money.

– If a person has a regional rate, then priority has been given to those who are less well in the region?

-No. Anyone who comes to the main Moscow square for the CSP, he will, of course, receive. But when they say they will work part-time, but at the same time, he apparently understands somewhere. As for the juniors, I immediately said who will go to work at the CSP, after that we can’t even ask ourselves questions about what will go to part-time. If you receive a salary in the region, get it there, because it becomes obsolete for you. It’s not extra money, it’s a salary. And we started with the juniors, which are absolutely empty. That’s why they work full time,” Bragin told .